The Hummingbird's Share: On the Permission to Write for Tiny Rooms
You know the itch. It starts somewhere around the sternum. You finish a piece of writing—a newsletter, a blog post, a chapter—and the quiet question arrives, hushed but insistent: Is it enough? Not good enough, which is its own familiar demon, but enough as in volume. Did you say everything about the topic? Did you cover all the angles, consider all the counterarguments, offer all the examples? The impulse is to add. To bulk it up, to prove your thoroughness, to ensure no reader can accuse you of leaving something out. This, I've come to believe, is the writer's most common and most corrosive form of generosity. It is a generosity that smothers.
We write for an imagined audience of voracious experts, a packed lecture hall of critics waiting to pounce on what we omitted. But in doing so, we often miss a far more real and receptive audience: the couple of people in a small, sunlit room, leaning in. I call this giving your readers the hummingbird's share—not the sprawling, overflowing feast, but the single, potent droplet of nectar. It is a concentrated gift. And it requires a specific, counterintuitive permission: You are allowed to write for the tiny room.
The Economics of Attention
This isn't about being lazy or superficial. It's about a different economy, where the currency isn't the weight of your words but the quality of the light they let in. A piece of writing that attempts to say everything about, say, 'building suspense,' will inevitably become a textbook, flattening its own contours. But a piece that dissects one perfect sentence from Daphne du Maurier and how its rhythm creates unease? That has a pinpoint focus. It offers a complete experience, a full meditation on a single facet. The reader leaves not with an encyclopedia entry, but with a new, sharpened lens.
Writing for the tiny room means trusting that the specific is the only reliable doorway to the universal. It means your ideal reader isn't the skeptic scanning for gaps, but the curious mind hungry for a new way of seeing one, single thing. They don't want the whole forest explained; they want to be shown the unique pattern of moss on one particular north-facing stone, and in that detail, understand something profound about moisture, time, and shade.
Granting yourself this permission changes the editorial craft from a process of accumulation to one of distillation. The question shifts from 'What else can I include?' to 'What is the irreducible core of my thought?' It becomes an act of framing. You are not building a sprawling estate for readers to wander; you are designing a perfect window and insisting on the particular, splendid view from it. That is the work: not to fill the space, but to define its boundaries with such clarity that what's inside becomes vividly, memorably alive.
The hummingbird does not mourn the flowers it didn't visit. It takes what it needs for sustained flight, and in that focus, finds its strength. Your writing can do the same. Offer the droplet, not the deluge. Write for the few who are leaning in, listening closely. They are the ones who will truly hear you, and carry your thought, intact and potent, out into the world.
Notes & further reading
A few pages I came back to while writing this:
- Akron, OH
- The Archivist of the Aisle: On the Hidden Craft of the Library's Edgewriter
- Cincinnati, OH
- The Sculptor and the Gardener: On the Dueling Disciplines of Shaping a Draft
- Dayton, OH
- The Paragraph's Pulse: On the Subtle Rhythm of the Indent
- Toledo, OH
- Oklahoma City, OK
- Tulsa, OK
- Eugene, OR
- Portland, OR
- Salem, OR
- Philadelphia, PA